design element
Dana Investment Advisors  Logo
15800 Bluemound Rd., Suite 250
Brookfield, WI 53005
1-800-765-0157
dedicated to your investment
shim

ROLL OUT THE BARREL

October 10, 2006
Dow: 11,840

The gangs all here. OPEC (Organization of Petroleum Exporting Countries) that is. Like a petulant child, they are annoyed by the 24% recent drop in the price of oil from $78 a barrel to $59 a barrel. As a result, they are considering calling an emergency meeting to cut oil production in order to force prices back up to $70 or more a barrel. The last time OPEC threw a tantrum was in 1973; it caused long lines at the gas station and a recession. This is not a true oil market where prices are determined by supply and demand. OPEC is a cartel that controls the price of oil. Nine of every ten barrels of crude reserves are in the hands of state-owned or state-controlled companies. OPEC currently controls about a third of global output, but non-OPEC oil is growing steadily. Recently huge oil reserves were discovered in the Gulf of Mexico, and Mexico itself has large amounts of untapped oil reserves. Oil shale is another source of oil and is found in large quantities in Canada and even here in America.

In a recent interview Paolo Scaroni the Chief Executive of Eni of Italy, one of the world’s top oil companies, expressed his opinion that $60 for a barrel of oil was not very high. His reasoning was that the American consumer burns twenty-six barrels of oil per year compared with twelve barrels for Europeans. He says that it has been clear to everyone that the Western world can live with $70 a barrel for oil and more as economies continue to expand and inflation remains low. He believes that the American economy is wasteful in its energy use (he is probably correct). He further states that if American cars had the same efficiency as European cars, we would save the total production of Iran or four million barrels a day.

Hugo Chavez of course is doing his best to roil the oil market by nationalizing the oil companies in Venezuela and forcing foreign oil companies to accept less lucrative contacts for future oil rights. Venezuela is the fifth largest foreign source of oil for the US. Venezuelan oil exports to the US dropped 6% in the first half of this year to about 1.3 million barrels per day. Recently the 7-Eleven stores in the US stopped buying oil from Citgo which is wholly owned by Venezuelan government, and we can probably expect further backlash from Chavez. He is certainly not our friend, and we will eventually wean ourselves off his oil. He is in political trouble at home so the playing field could change at any time.

The negative aspect of finding new oil reserves is that it will delay the research for alternative sources of energy. Fossil fuels are going the way of the dinosaur, and the sooner we find new sources of energy the better. The big losers will be OPEC as they will gradually lose their leverage over us.

Here’s an idea that has been floated before and is getting attention again – raise the tax on gasoline. The average tax on gasoline per gallon in the US is $0.40 and that includes state and federal taxes. In contrast, gasoline taxes are $4.24 in Britain, $3.80 in France, $2.07 in Japan and $1.03 in Canada. At a business meeting in late September, Alan Greenspan was asked if he would like to see an increase in the federal gasoline tax which has stood at 18.4 cents a gallon since 1993. “Yes, I would,” Greenspan responded. “That’s the way to get consumption down. It’s a national security issue.” It’s not likely you will hear too much about this in an election year or even before the 2008 presidential election. This is a button hotter than Social Security reform, and it would be hard to get Americans behind it no matter how practical it might be.

Bureaucratic Waste Dept: In New York City officials want to ban the use of all trans fats in restaurants. How many trans fat policemen will be required to monitor that? In California, Attorney General Bill Lockyer has sued the six largest automakers in the US for making vehicles that contribute to global warming. Lockyer says that the auto companies have created a “public nuisance” by making millions of vehicles that emit huge quantities of carbon dioxide, a greenhouse gas that contributes to global warming. Imagine the cost to taxpayers to pursue this wasteful lawsuit. Further, imagine the world’s largest economy functioning without cars and trucks. Next will be a lawsuit against dairy and cattle farmers for raising flatulent cattle herds that yearly emit tons of methane, another greenhouse gas.

 

Random thought for October 2006:

The cruise liner, QE2, moves only six inches for each gallon of diesel that it burns.


Dana Investment Advisors welcomes any comments to their newsletter and is more than willing to discuss or explain any aspect of the letter. Feel free to call us at 262-782-3631.

If you would prefer to have our newsletter e-mailed, please send your e-mail address to newsletter@danainvestment.com.

If you would like to be notified when our portfolio managers will be broadcasting in the media, please send your e-mail address to media@danainvestment.com.

MikeDana signature Jim Ivey signature
Michael L. Dana
Chief Executive Officer
James W. Ivey
President
bottom

HOME | PHILOSOPHY | PEOPLE | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
SMALL CAP | LARGE CAP EQUITY | SOCIALLY RESPONSIBLE | LIM VOL I | LIM VOL II | INTERMEDIATE | MUNICIPAL | BALANCED

© Dana Investment Advisors, Inc. 2008 All rights reserved.


design element